#1
Inn.4
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 20%
Opponent allowing 35%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 20%
Opponent allowing 35%
Sustained highCombined vs league +10pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #131% 22/72 | 14% 10/72 | 18% 13/72 | 21% 15/72 | #224% 17/72 | #322% 16/72 | 19% 14/72 | 22% 16/72 | 20% 11/55 | 14% 3/21 |
| RA | #219% 14/72 | 14% 10/72 | 7% 5/72 | #122% 16/72 | 14% 10/72 | 14% 10/72 | 12% 9/72 | 14% 10/72 | #318% 11/60 | 10% 2/20 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | 19% 13/67 | 15% 10/67 | 15% 10/67 | #221% 14/67 | #321% 14/67 | 16% 11/67 | 19% 13/67 | #124% 16/67 | 16% 9/57 | 0% 0/16 |
| RA | #139% 26/67 | 25% 17/67 | 24% 16/67 | #231% 21/67 | 19% 13/67 | 24% 16/67 | 21% 14/67 | #330% 20/67 | 20% 9/45 | 18% 3/17 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.