#1
Inn.6
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
38%
Own scoring 37%
Opponent allowing 40%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
43%
Own scoring 40%
Opponent allowing 45%
Sustained highCombined vs league +31pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #126% 37/140 | 20% 28/140 | 22% 31/140 | 21% 30/140 | 19% 26/140 | #225% 35/139 | 17% 24/138 | #322% 31/138 | 17% 17/103 | 10% 3/31 |
| RA | #224% 33/140 | 17% 24/140 | #320% 28/140 | 19% 26/140 | 18% 25/140 | #124% 34/139 | 19% 26/138 | 12% 17/138 | 15% 16/104 | 29% 8/28 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #229% 40/137 | 23% 31/137 | 22% 30/137 | #329% 40/137 | 26% 35/137 | #134% 47/137 | 27% 37/137 | 28% 39/137 | 17% 18/104 | 33% 8/24 |
| RA | #329% 40/137 | 19% 26/137 | 24% 33/137 | #136% 50/137 | 18% 25/137 | #230% 41/137 | 26% 36/137 | 17% 23/137 | 17% 20/115 | 21% 5/24 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.