#1
Inn.8
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
25%
Own scoring 25%
Opponent allowing 25%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
30%
Own scoring 30%
Opponent allowing 30%
Sustained highCombined vs league +9pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #227% 36/134 | 22% 29/134 | #326% 35/134 | 26% 35/134 | 19% 26/134 | 23% 30/133 | #128% 37/133 | 26% 34/133 | 17% 16/93 | 16% 4/25 |
| RA | 21% 28/134 | 16% 22/134 | 22% 29/134 | 20% 27/134 | 16% 21/134 | #322% 29/133 | #125% 33/133 | #223% 31/133 | 13% 14/109 | 14% 4/28 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #228% 38/136 | 25% 34/136 | 24% 33/136 | #129% 39/136 | 21% 28/136 | 24% 32/136 | #327% 37/135 | 25% 34/135 | 19% 19/101 | 8% 2/25 |
| RA | 26% 35/136 | #230% 41/136 | 23% 31/136 | 24% 32/136 | 23% 31/136 | #134% 46/136 | 27% 36/135 | #328% 37/134 | 16% 15/95 | 9% 2/22 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.