#1
Inn.2
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 30%
Opponent allowing 25%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
38%
Own scoring 45%
Opponent allowing 30%
Sustained highCombined vs league +21pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | 25% 30/119 | 20% 24/119 | #327% 32/119 | #129% 34/119 | 18% 22/119 | 23% 27/118 | #228% 33/118 | 26% 31/118 | 18% 15/85 | 12% 3/24 |
| RA | #323% 27/119 | 18% 22/119 | 23% 27/119 | 23% 27/119 | 17% 20/119 | 20% 24/118 | #125% 29/118 | #224% 28/118 | 12% 11/95 | 11% 3/27 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #228% 34/120 | 24% 29/120 | 24% 29/120 | #328% 33/120 | 21% 25/120 | 23% 28/120 | #129% 34/119 | 26% 31/119 | 17% 15/90 | 10% 2/21 |
| RA | 26% 31/120 | #230% 36/120 | 25% 30/120 | 22% 26/120 | 21% 25/120 | #134% 41/120 | #329% 35/119 | 29% 34/118 | 15% 12/81 | 10% 2/20 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.