#1
Inn.1
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
25%
Own scoring 30%
Opponent allowing 20%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
40%
Own scoring 45%
Opponent allowing 35%
Sustained highCombined vs league +21pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #229% 6/21 | #133% 7/21 | 14% 3/21 | #329% 6/21 | 29% 6/21 | 15% 3/20 | 10% 2/20 | 20% 4/20 | 14% 2/14 | 17% 1/6 |
| RA | #233% 7/21 | 14% 3/21 | 14% 3/21 | 14% 3/21 | 10% 2/21 | 10% 2/20 | #330% 6/20 | #135% 7/20 | 7% 1/15 | 0% 0/7 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #145% 10/22 | 9% 2/22 | 14% 3/22 | 14% 3/22 | 14% 3/22 | #318% 4/22 | #241% 9/22 | 18% 4/22 | 7% 1/15 | 0% 0/5 |
| RA | 18% 4/22 | #132% 7/22 | 18% 4/22 | 23% 5/22 | 9% 2/22 | #232% 7/22 | #327% 6/22 | 14% 3/21 | 7% 1/15 | 0% 0/5 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.