#1
Inn.1
Hiroshima Carp scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 35%
Opponent allowing 20%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
38%
Own scoring 40%
Opponent allowing 35%
Sustained highCombined vs league +16pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiroshima Carp | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiroshima Carp | R | #124% 34/141 | 15% 21/141 | 16% 23/141 | #224% 34/141 | 18% 26/141 | 21% 29/140 | #321% 30/140 | 16% 23/140 | 14% 15/104 | 19% 6/32 |
| RA | #124% 34/141 | #223% 32/141 | 14% 20/141 | #323% 32/141 | 14% 20/141 | 20% 28/140 | 17% 24/140 | 19% 26/140 | 14% 14/103 | 7% 2/30 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #130% 43/141 | #325% 35/141 | 24% 34/141 | #226% 37/141 | 24% 33/140 | 22% 31/138 | 24% 33/138 | 22% 31/138 | 18% 20/109 | 9% 2/22 |
| RA | 25% 35/141 | 22% 31/141 | 25% 35/141 | #130% 42/141 | #228% 39/141 | 21% 29/138 | #326% 36/138 | 20% 28/138 | 21% 20/96 | 12% 3/25 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.