#1
Inn.1
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
48%
Own scoring 60%
Opponent allowing 35%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 20%
Opponent allowing 35%
Sustained highCombined vs league +27pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | X | 5 | 9 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #224% 30/126 | 21% 26/126 | 17% 21/126 | 22% 28/126 | #324% 30/126 | #127% 34/125 | 19% 24/124 | 20% 24/123 | 10% 9/91 | 13% 4/31 |
| RA | #222% 28/126 | 19% 24/126 | 16% 20/126 | 15% 19/126 | #127% 34/125 | 14% 18/125 | 18% 22/125 | 19% 23/123 | #320% 19/95 | 16% 5/31 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #129% 35/122 | #325% 30/122 | 22% 27/122 | #226% 32/122 | 21% 25/121 | 21% 25/119 | 24% 28/119 | 24% 29/119 | 19% 18/97 | 9% 2/22 |
| RA | #326% 32/122 | 25% 30/122 | 23% 28/122 | #129% 35/122 | #228% 34/122 | 22% 26/119 | 24% 29/119 | 21% 25/119 | 22% 18/81 | 12% 3/25 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.