#1
Inn.1
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
43%
Own scoring 55%
Opponent allowing 30%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
32%
Own scoring 25%
Opponent allowing 40%
Sustained highCombined vs league +27pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #323% 29/125 | 21% 26/125 | 17% 21/125 | 22% 28/125 | #224% 30/125 | #127% 34/124 | 20% 24/123 | 20% 24/122 | 9% 8/90 | 13% 4/31 |
| RA | #222% 28/125 | 19% 24/125 | 16% 20/125 | 15% 19/125 | #127% 34/124 | 15% 18/124 | 18% 22/124 | 19% 23/122 | #320% 19/94 | 16% 5/31 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #129% 35/121 | #325% 30/121 | 22% 27/121 | #226% 32/121 | 21% 25/120 | 21% 25/118 | 24% 28/118 | 25% 29/118 | 19% 18/96 | 9% 2/22 |
| RA | #326% 31/121 | 25% 30/121 | 23% 28/121 | #129% 35/121 | #228% 34/121 | 22% 26/118 | 25% 29/118 | 21% 25/118 | 21% 17/80 | 12% 3/25 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.