#1
Inn.1
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
43%
Own scoring 55%
Opponent allowing 30%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 20%
Opponent allowing 35%
Sustained highCombined vs league +23pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 13 | 1 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | R | #323% 28/124 | 20% 25/124 | 17% 21/124 | 23% 28/124 | #223% 29/124 | #127% 33/123 | 20% 24/122 | 20% 24/121 | 9% 8/89 | 13% 4/31 |
| RA | #222% 27/124 | 19% 24/124 | 16% 20/124 | 15% 19/124 | #128% 34/123 | 15% 18/123 | 18% 22/123 | 19% 23/121 | #320% 19/93 | 16% 5/31 | |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #128% 34/120 | #325% 30/120 | 22% 27/120 | #227% 32/120 | 21% 25/119 | 21% 25/117 | 24% 28/117 | 25% 29/117 | 19% 18/95 | 9% 2/22 |
| RA | #325% 30/120 | 24% 29/120 | 23% 28/120 | #129% 35/120 | #228% 33/120 | 21% 25/117 | 25% 29/117 | 21% 25/117 | 22% 17/79 | 12% 3/25 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.