#1
Inn.1
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
40%
Own scoring 35%
Opponent allowing 45%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
28%
Own scoring 25%
Opponent allowing 30%
Sustained highCombined vs league +17pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 0 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TigersHanshin Tigers | R | #133% 44/133 | 17% 22/133 | 23% 30/133 | 20% 26/133 | 26% 34/133 | #229% 39/133 | 24% 31/131 | 21% 27/131 | #326% 27/105 | 14% 2/14 |
| RA | 23% 31/133 | 20% 27/133 | 20% 26/133 | #224% 32/133 | 15% 20/133 | #324% 32/133 | #126% 35/133 | 22% 29/131 | 13% 14/106 | 18% 3/17 | |
| SwallowsTokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #321% 28/134 | 19% 26/134 | 16% 21/134 | 19% 25/134 | #223% 31/134 | #125% 33/133 | 20% 27/132 | 16% 21/130 | 14% 15/109 | 13% 2/15 |
| RA | #129% 39/134 | 21% 28/134 | 22% 29/134 | 22% 29/134 | 22% 30/134 | 26% 35/133 | #228% 37/130 | 14% 18/130 | #328% 29/102 | 21% 3/14 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.