#1
Inn.1
Hanshin Tigers scoring tendency
35%
Own scoring 35%
Opponent allowing 35%
Tokyo Yakult Swallows scoring tendency
30%
Own scoring 40%
Opponent allowing 20%
Sustained highCombined vs league +15pp
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanshin Tigers | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
| Tokyo Yakult Swallows | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 |
Ranked from both teams’ inning offense and defense. Each team value combines its scoring rate with the opponent’s allowing rate; the league gap sums both sides. This is historical context, not a prediction.
Each cell combines both teams’ tendencies; select an inning to see the split
Each team is ranked separately: #1–#3 mark the top three scoring rates and allowing rates.
| Team | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TigersHanshin Tigers | R | #133% 39/119 | 17% 20/119 | 23% 27/119 | 18% 22/119 | 25% 30/119 | #232% 38/119 | 26% 30/117 | 22% 26/117 | #327% 25/94 | 11% 1/9 |
| RA | #323% 27/119 | 21% 25/119 | 19% 23/119 | 23% 27/119 | 15% 18/119 | #224% 28/119 | #125% 30/119 | 22% 26/117 | 14% 13/93 | 18% 2/11 | |
| SwallowsTokyo Yakult Swallows | R | #321% 25/119 | 20% 24/119 | 16% 19/119 | 17% 20/119 | #223% 27/119 | #125% 29/118 | 21% 24/117 | 17% 20/116 | 14% 13/96 | 9% 1/11 |
| RA | 26% 31/119 | 19% 23/119 | 21% 25/119 | 23% 27/119 | 24% 29/119 | #326% 31/118 | #228% 32/116 | 14% 16/116 | #129% 26/91 | 20% 2/10 |
Scoring rate is the share of actual offensive innings with at least one run. Unplayed half-innings are excluded; extras do not enter the top-three ranking.